Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 290 Download : 125

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article discusses the importance of learning evaluation in elementary schools and various approaches and strategies that can be used in managing evaluation. The article was born from a literature research type, which designs and collects data based on reading sources, both offline and online. The article explains that learning evaluation is an important process in assessing learning objectives and providing feedback to teachers and students to improve the quality of learning in elementary schools. The article also highlights several evaluation approaches such as formative and summative evaluation, as well as evaluation strategies such as the use of tests, observations, and portfolios. Additionally, the article emphasizes the important role of effective evaluation management in ensuring accurate and reliable learning evaluation. In conclusion, this article provides a broad overview of learning evaluation management in elementary schools and provides advice for teachers and principals to optimize the learning evaluation process in elementary schools.

Keywords

management learning evaluation approach strategy

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

By exercising the Licensed Rights, You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License.

How to Cite
Hisbullah, H., & Ajigoena, A. M. (2021). Management of Learning Evaluation in Elementary Schools. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 9(2), 704-713. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v9i2.318

References

  1. Adeoye-Olatunde, O. A., & Olenik, N. L. (2021). Research and scholarly methods: Semi-structured interviews. JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 4(10), 1358–1367. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1441
  2. Adom, D., Mensah, J. A., & Dake, D. A. (2020). Test, Measurement, and Evaluation: Understanding and Use of the Concepts in Education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 109–119.
  3. Ahmad, S., Sultana, N., & Jamil, S. (2020). Behaviorism vs Constructivism: A Paradigm Shift from Traditional to Alternative Assessment Techniques. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 7(2), Article 2.
  4. Alabidi, S., Owais, A., Alabidi, F., & Taani, O. (2022). Exploring the Role of Reflective Diaries as a Formative Assessment Strategy in Promoting Self-Regulated Learning among ESL Students. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 27. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1359374
  5. Alismail, H. A., & McGuire, P. (2015). 21st Century Standards and Curriculum: Current Research and Practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(6), 150–154.
  6. Allal, L. (2021). Involving primary school students in the co-construction of formative assessment in support of writing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(5–6), 584–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1951164
  7. Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching Critical Thinking Skills: Literature Review. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 19(1), 21–39.
  8. Alzaid, J. M. (2017). The Effect of Peer Assessment on the Evaluation Process of Students. International Education Studies, 10(6), 159–173.
  9. Alzoubi, M. M., Hayati, K., Rosliza, A., Ahmad, A., & Al-Hamdan, Z. (2019). Total quality management in the health-care context: Integrating the literature and directing future research. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 12, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S197038
  10. Andrade, H. L., & Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992
  11. Baleni, Z. G. (2015). Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(4), Article 4.
  12. Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). One Piece of the Whole: Teacher Evaluation as Part of a Comprehensive System for Teaching and Learning. American Educator, 38(1), 4.
  13. Ekpenyong, L. E. (2018). Constructivist Approaches: An Emerging Paradigm for the Teaching and Learning of Business Education. Nigerian Journal of Business Education (NIGJBED), 3(1), Article 1.
  14. Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional Design Perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143
  15. Fahmi, F., Setiadi, I., Elmawati, D., & Sunardi, S. (2019). Discovery Learning Method for Training Critical Thinking Skills of Students. European Journal of Education Studies, 0, Article 0. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2540
  16. Fernando, S. Y. J. N., & Marikar, F. M. M. T. (2017). Constructivist Teaching/Learning Theory and Participatory Teaching Methods. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 6(1), 110–122.
  17. Forbes, K. (2018). Exploring First Year Undergraduate Students’ Conceptualizations of Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(3), 433–442.
  18. Gelfer, J., ‘O’ Hara, K., Krasch, D., & Nguyen, N. (2015). Teacher portfolios: An effective way to assess teacher performance and enhance learning. Early Child Development and Care, 185(9), 1495–1503. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1005614
  19. Ghaicha, A. (2016). Theoretical Framework for Educational Assessment: A Synoptic Review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(24), 212–231.
  20. Heitink, M. C., Van der Kleij, F. M., Veldkamp, B. P., Schildkamp, K., & Kippers, W. B. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational Research Review, 17, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.002
  21. Hildén, R., & Fröjdendahl, B. (2018). The dawn of assessment literacy: Exploring the conceptions of Finnish student teachers in foreign languages. Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.17011/apples/urn.201802201542
  22. Juvova, A., Chudy, S., Neumeister, P., Plischke, J., & Kvintova, J. (2015). Reflection of Constructivist Theories in Current Educational Practice. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(5), 345–349.
  23. Kaufman, D. M. (2018). Teaching and Learning in Medical Education. In Understanding Medical Education (pp. 37–69). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119373780.ch4
  24. Khalil, M. K., & Elkhider, I. A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2015
  25. Kibble, J. D. (2017). Best practices in summative assessment. Advances in Physiology Education, 41(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00116.2016
  26. Kulasegaram, K., & Rangachari, P. K. (2018). Beyond “formative”: Assessments to enrich student learning. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00122.2017
  27. Kumar, V., & Sharma, R. R. K. (2017). Relating management problem-solving styles of leaders to TQM focus: An empirical study. The TQM Journal, 29(2), 218–239. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-01-2016-0002
  28. Lapitan, L. DS., Tiangco, C. E., Sumalinog, D. A. G., Sabarillo, N. S., & Diaz, J. M. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012
  29. Matthewman, L. J., Nowlan, J., & Hyvönen, K. (2018). Reciprocal peer coaching: A constructivist methodology for enhancing formative assessment strategy in tertiary education. International Coaching Psychology Review, 13(1), Article 1.
  30. Narciss, S. (2017). Conditions and Effects of Feedback Viewed Through the Lens of the Interactive Tutoring Feedback Model. In D. Carless, S. M. Bridges, C. K. Y. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education (pp. 173–189). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_12
  31. Ninomiya, S. (2016). The Possibilities and Limitations of Assessment for Learning: Exploring the Theory of Formative Assessment and the Notion of “Closing the Learning Gap.” Educational Studies in Japan, 10, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.7571/esjkyoiku.10.79
  32. Osueke, B., Mekonnen, B., & Stanton, J. D. (2018). How Undergraduate Science Students Use Learning Objectives to Study. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(2), 19.2.30. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i2.1510
  33. Persky, A. M., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2017). The Flipped Classroom – From Theory to Practice in Health Professional Education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(6). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe816118
  34. Persky, A. M., Medina, M. S., & Castleberry, A. N. (2019). Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Pharmacy Students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(2). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7033
  35. Plessis, E. du. (2020). Student teachers’ perceptions, experiences, and challenges regarding learner-centred teaching. South African Journal of Education, 40(1), Article 1. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/saje/article/view/194256
  36. Raterink, G. (2016). Reflective Journaling for Critical Thinking Development in Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Students. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(2), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20160114-08
  37. Rohloff, T., Sauer, D., & Meinel, C. (2019). On the Acceptance and Usefulness of Personalized Learning Objectives in MOOCs. Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3330430.3333624
  38. Ryan, R. M., Duineveld, J. J., Di Domenico, S. I., Ryan, W. S., Steward, B. A., & Bradshaw, E. L. (2022). We know this much is (meta-analytically) true: A meta-review of meta-analytic findings evaluating self-determination theory. Psychological Bulletin, 148, 813–842. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000385
  39. Sablić, M., Mirosavljević, A., & Škugor, A. (2021). Video-Based Learning (VBL)—Past, Present and Future: An Overview of the Research Published from 2008 to 2019. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 1061–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09455-5
  40. Sener, S., & Çokçaliskan, A. (2018). An Investigation between Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(2), 125–132.
  41. Shepard, L. A., Penuel, W. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2018). Using Learning and Motivation Theories to Coherently Link Formative Assessment, Grading Practices, and Large-Scale Assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12189
  42. Simeon, M. I., Samsudin, M. A., & Yakob, N. (2022). Effect of design thinking approach on students’ achievement in some selected physics concepts in the context of STEM learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09601-1
  43. Singh, A., Singh, H. P., Alam, F., & Agrawal, V. (2022). Role of Education, Training, and E-Learning in Sustainable Employment Generation and Social Empowerment in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 14(14), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148822
  44. Sochacka, N. W., Guyotte, Kelly. W., & Walther, J. (2016). Learning Together: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration of STEAM (STEM + the Arts) Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(1), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20112
  45. Sotiriadou, P., Logan, D., Daly, A., & Guest, R. (2020). The role of authentic assessment to preserve academic integrity and promote skill development and employability. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2132–2148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1582015
  46. Suhendi, A., Purwarno, P., & Chairani, S. (2021). Constructivism-Based Teaching and Learning in Indonesian Education. KnE Social Sciences, 76–89. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i4.8668
  47. Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2017). Contextual Learning: Innovative Approach towards the Development of Students’ Scientific Attitude and Natural Science Performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79329
  48. Toom, A., Husu, J., & Patrikainen, S. (2015). Student teachers’ patterns of reflection in the context of teaching practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.943731
  49. Van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Integrating data-based decision making, Assessment for Learning and diagnostic testing in formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(3), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999024
  50. Wallin, P., & Adawi, T. (2018). The reflective diary as a method for the formative assessment of self-regulated learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(4), 507–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1290585
  51. Whiley, D., Witt, B., Colvin, R. M., Sapiains Arrue, R., & Kotir, J. (2017). Enhancing critical thinking skills in first year environmental management students: A tale of curriculum design, application and reflection. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(2), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2017.1290590
  52. Whitener, J. L. (2016). Using the elements of cooperative learning in school band classes in the United States. International Journal of Music Education, 34(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761414541865
  53. Wong, J., Baars, M., de Koning, B. B., van der Zee, T., Davis, D., Khalil, M., Houben, G.-J., & Paas, F. (2019). Educational Theories and Learning Analytics: From Data to Knowledge. In D. Ifenthaler, D.-K. Mah, & J. Y.-K. Yau (Eds.), Utilizing Learning Analytics to Support Study Success (pp. 3–25). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64792-0_1
  54. Yu, K.-C., Fan, S.-C., & Lin, K.-Y. (2015). Enhancing Students’ Problem-Solving Skills Through Context-Based Learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1377–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9567-4
  55. Zayapragassarazan, Z., Menon, V., Kar, S. S., & Batmanabane, G. (2016). Understanding Critical Thinking to Create Better Doctors. In Online Submission (Vol. 1, Issue 3, pp. 9–13). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED572834
  56. Zeng, W., Huang, F., Yu, L., & Chen, S. (2018). Towards a learning-oriented assessment to improve students’ learning—A critical review of literature. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 30(3), 211–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-018-9281-9

Most read articles by the same author(s)