Peer Review

Review Model Double-Blind Peer Review

Kontigensi: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen maintains rigorous standards of double-blind peer review while continually enhancing the procedural efficiency of publication. All original research manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo exhaustive evaluation to ensure methodological validity, academic contribution, and originality.

Key Characteristics of the Review Process

Principles governing manuscript evaluation and decision-making:

1
Independent Expert Evaluation: All research articles are evaluated by at least two suitably qualified independent experts within the relevant field of study.
2
Final Editorial Decisions: Final publication decisions (Accept, Revisions Required, or Reject) rest entirely with the Editor-in-Chief, grounded on the critical feedback and recommendations furnished by reviewers.
3
Advisory & Editorial Oversight: Members of the advisory and international Editorial Boards provide strategic guidance, academic insight, and procedural advice to assist the Editor-in-Chief with complex or specialized submissions.
4
Operational Efficiency: Managing Editors and Editorial Assistants supply the operational and administrative infrastructure necessary to maintain ethical integrity while assuring rapid turnaround times for authors and reviewers.
5
Manuscript Referral Collaboration: Kontigensi additionally leverages reciprocal referral networks to benefit from preliminary peer assessments conducted across high-impact and established partner journals.

Peer Review of Referred Papers

Editors of Kontigensi: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen will decide promptly whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for referred manuscripts based on prior reviewer feedback and editorial assessments from supporting journals.

Note: Editors retain the prerogative to seek additional review cycles whenever deemed necessary. Corresponding authors will be formally notified whenever supplementary evaluations are commissioned.