Main Article Content

Abstract

This study delves into the realm of leadership within Indonesian non-profit organizations, recognizing the critical role it plays in influencing employee motivation. Against the backdrop of Indonesia's diverse and dynamic non-profit sector, characterized by its unique challenges and opportunities, this research seeks to explore the multifaceted relationship between leadership styles and the motivation levels of employees. The primary aim is to shed light on how different leadership approaches are perceived and practiced within this context, and their subsequent impact on employee motivation. To achieve this, a qualitative research methodology is employed, involving in-depth interviews, focus groups, and content analysis of relevant documents. Through a purposive sampling strategy, leaders and employees from a diverse range of Indonesian non-profit organizations are engaged in open discussions, providing rich insights into their experiences and perceptions. The findings reveal that leadership styles encompass a spectrum ranging from transformational to transactional, with varying implications for employee motivation. Transformational leadership is found to foster a culture of inspiration, intrinsic motivation, and commitment among employees, whereas transactional leadership tends to rely on extrinsic rewards and compliance. These findings offer valuable insights for non-profit organizations in Indonesia, aiding them in making informed decisions regarding leadership practices to enhance employee motivation and, consequently, organizational effectiveness.

Keywords

Leadership Styles; Employee Motivation Non-Profit Organizations

Article Details

How to Cite
Hamsinah, H. (2024). A Qualitative Examination of Leadership Styles and Their Impact on Employee Motivation in Indonesian Non-Profit Organizations. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 12(1), 169-175. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v12i1.547

References

  1. Abbasi, E., & Zamani-Miandashti, N. (2013). The role of transformational leadership, organizational culture and organizational learning in improving the performance of Iranian agricultural faculties. Higher Education, 66(4), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9618-8
  2. Adil, A., & Kamal, A. (2016). Impact of Psychological Capital and Authentic Leadership on Work Engagement and Job Related Affective Well-being. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 31(1), 1–21.
  3. Antonakis, J. (2012). Transformational and charismatic leadership. The Nature of Leadership, 41(0), 256–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j-leaqua.2012.05.002
  4. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
  5. Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S. S., & Dodge, G. E. (2001). E-Leadership: Implications for Theory, Research and Practice. Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 615–668.
  6. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership: Good, better, best. Organizational Dynamics, 13(3), 26–40.
  7. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641–654.
  8. Brouwers, M., & Paltu, A. (2020). Toxic leadership: Effects on job satisfaction, commitment, turnover intention and organisational culture within the South African manufacturing industry. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(1), 1–11.
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
  10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  11. Crosby, D. H. (2015). Improving Employee Retention in the Public Sector by Increasing Employee Engagement. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2555709.
  12. Effendy, A. A., Sunarsi, D., Kristianti, L. S., Irawati, L., & Wahyitno, W. (2020). Effect Of Giving Reward and Motivation to Employee Productivity In PT. Sinar Kencana Jaya In Surabaya. HUMANIS (Humanities, Management and Science Proceedings), 1(1).
  13. Executive, S. (2007). Employee Engagement in the Public Sector: A Review of the Literature. Office of the Chief Researcher.
  14. Fathiizadeh, A., & Zare, R. (2021). Investigating the Relationship between Passive Leadership and Organizational Incivility Moderated by Experienced Incivility. Transformation Management Journal, 12(2), 189–206.
  15. Fletcher, L., Bailey, K., Alfes, K., & Madden, A. (2016). Employee Engagement in the Public Sector: A Narrative Evidence Synthesis. Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.13106abstract
  16. Fonseca Da Costa Guterresa, L., Armanu, & Rofiaty. (2020). The role of work motivation as a mediator on the influence of education-training and leadership style on employee performance. Management Science Letters, 10(7), 1497–1504. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.12.017
  17. Ghosh, P., Rai, A., & Sinha, A. (2014). Organizational justice and employee engagement: Exploring the linkage in public sector banks in India. Personnel Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-08-2013-0148
  18. Gui, L., Lei, H., & Le, P. B. (2022). Fostering product and process innovation through transformational leadership and knowledge management capability: the moderating role of innovation culture. European Journal of Innovation Management, ahead-of-print.
  19. Hamilton, J. R., Tee, S. W., & Prince, K. (2016). Corporate Leadership in The Digital Age. In L. Peng (Ed.), The Sixteenth International Conference on Electronic Business (Issue December, pp. 184–190). Xiamen University, China.
  20. Horwitz, I. B., Horwitz, S. K., Daram, P., Brandt, M. L., Charles Brunicardi, F., & Awad, S. S. (2008). Transformational, Transactional, and Passive-Avoidant Leadership Characteristics of a Surgical Resident Cohort: Analysis Using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire and Implications for Improving Surgical Education Curriculums. Journal of Surgical Research, 148(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2008.03.007
  21. Humphrey, A. (2012). Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behaviors: The role of organizational identification. Psychologist-Manager Journal, 15(4), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10887156.2012.731831
  22. Ivankova, N. V, & Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mixed methods. Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction, 23, 135–161.
  23. Kim, E. J., & Park, S. (2019). The role of transformational leadership in citizenship behavior: Organizational learning and interpersonal trust as mediators. International Journal of Manpower, 40(7), 1347–1360. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-12-2018-0413
  24. Kılıç, M., & Günsel, A. (2019). The dark side of the leadership: The effects of toxic leaders on employees. European Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 51–56.
  25. Maduka, C. E., & Okafor, O. (2014). Effect of motivation on employee productivity: A study of manufacturing companies in Nnewi. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 2(7), 137–147.
  26. Manoppo, V. P., Astuti, E. S., Raharjo, K., & Kusumawati, A. (2021). The Influence of Transformational Leadership, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, and Job Satisfaction to Turnover Intention. International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 32(4), 277–286.
  27. Nielsen, K., Yarker, J., Brenner, S.-O., Randall, R., & Borg, V. (2008). The importance of transformational leadership style for the well-being of employees working with older people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 63(5), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04701.x
  28. Niswaty, R., Wirawan, H., Akib, H., Saggaf, M. S., & Daraba, D. (2021). Investigating the effect of authentic leadership and employees’ psychological capital on work engagement: evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(5), e06992.
  29. Ohemeng, F. L. K., Obuobisa Darko, T., & Amoako-Asiedu, E. (2019). Bureaucratic leadership, trust building, and employee engagement in the public sector in Ghana. International Journal of Public Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpl-05-2019-0018
  30. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership as Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Management, 22(2), 259–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200204
  31. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviours and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviours. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142.
  32. Purwanto, A., Purba, J. T., Sijabat, R., & Bernarto, I. (2021). The Role of Transformational Leadership, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, Innovative Work Behaviour, Quality Work Life, Digital Transformation and Leader Member Exchange on Universities Performance. Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, Innovative Work Behaviour, Quality Work Life, Digital Transformation and Leader Member Exchange on Universities Performance (December 17, 2021).
  33. Qu, R., Janssen, O., & Shi, K. (2015). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The mediating role of follower relational identification and the moderating role of leader creativity expectations. Leadership Quarterly, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.12.004
  34. Risambessy, A., Swasto, B., Thoyib, A., & Astuti, E. S. (2012). The Influence of Transformational Leadership Style, Motivation, Burnout towards Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(9), 8833–8842. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.5.2.113-128
  35. Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 138–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001
  36. Sokrat, R. (2020). The Impact of Employee Engagement on Productivity: A Case of the Egyptian Public Sector. https://doi.org/10.21608/aja.2020.111868
  37. Solas, J. (2016). The banality of bad leadership and followership. Society and Business Review, 11(1), 12–23.
  38. Stefani, L. (2019). Toxic to transformational leadership: Peace, reconciliation, and social justice as the paradigm. Peace, Reconciliation and Social Justice Leadership in the 21st Century: The Role of Leaders and Followers, 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2058-880120190000008011.
  39. Syamsuddin, R. A., Pratama, A., Sunarsi, D., & Affandi, A. (2021). The Effect of Compensation and Work Discipline on Employee Performance with Work Motivation as an Intervening Variable. Kontigensi: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 9(1), 89-94.
  40. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913
  41. Weizi Li, Kecheng Liu, Yinshan Tang, M. B. (2016). E-Leadership for SMEs in the Digital Age. In The Palgrave Handbook of Managing Continuous Business Transformation. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60228-2
  42. Yucel, I., McMillan, A., & Richard, O. C. (2014). Does CEO transformational leadership influence top executive normative commitment? Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1170–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.005
  43. Zaman, U., Florez-Perez, L., Anjam, M., Ghani Khwaja, M., & Ul-Huda, N. (2023). At the end of the world, turn left: examining toxic leadership, team silence and success in mega construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(6), 2436–2462. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2021-0755
  44. Zhang, J., Huang, R., Chen, Q., & Zhao, G. (2023). The relationships between supervisor-subordinate guanxi, perceived supervisor autonomy support, autonomous motivation, and employee job satisfaction: Evidence from international hotel chains in China. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 108, 103354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103354.