Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 209 Download : 109

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the interactions between a number of variables that affect the effective corporate tax rate (ETR), including special transaction relationship—in this example, affiliate debt—modal intensity, and profitability—using the size of the company as a moderating variable. Panel data from 41 manufacturing businesses listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange for the years 2017 through 2021 was used to implement the strategy. Our findings demonstrate that the impact of special relationship transactions on effective tax rates is neither affected nor changed by corporation size. According to data processing findings, a company's size can both adversely reduce the impact of modal intensity on the effective tax rate and positively moderate the impact of modal intensification on the effective tax rate. These results, in our opinion, will be helpful to governments when deciding on fiscal policies as well as to businesses when deciding where to locate and make investments in these nations. This study, in our opinion, is a significant contribution to the literature since it takes into account new factors, including institutional and business-related factors, that were not jointly taken into account in other studies on the determinant effective tax rate.

Keywords

Effective Tax Rate Profitability Modal Intensity Special Relationship Transaction Tax

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

By exercising the Licensed Rights, You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License.

How to Cite
Hakim, L., & Daljono, D. (2023). The Role of Firm Size as a Moderating Variable on Special Relationship Transactions, Modal Intensity, and Profitability Towards Effective Tax Rate. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11(2), 449-457. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v11i2.445

References

  1. Assidi, S., Aliani, K., & Omri, M. A. (2016). Tax optimization and the firm’s value: Evidence from the Tunisian context. Borsa Istanbul Review, 16(3), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2016.04.002
  2. Aulia, N. A., & Ernandi, H. (2022a). Effect of Firm Size, Profitability and Capital Intensity on Effective Tax Rate (ETR). Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 16. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v15i0.791
  3. Aulia, N. A., & Ernandi, H. (2022b). Effect of Firm Size, Profitability and Capital Intensity on Effective Tax Rate (ETR). Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 16. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v15i0.791
  4. Barbera, A., Merello, P., & Molina, R. (2020). Determinants of corporate effective tax rates: evidence from the euro area. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administracion, 33(3–4), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-12-2019-0238
  5. Belz, T., von Hagen, D., & Steffens, C. (2019). Taxes and firm size: Political cost or political power? Journal of Accounting Literature, 42, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2018.12.001
  6. Cheng, H., Chen, X., & Qi, S. (2023). Asymmetric corporate tax compliance: Evidence from a tax reform in China. China Economic Review, 79, 101967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2023.101967
  7. Clemente-Almendros, J. A., & González-Cruz, T. (2023). Family involvement and proactive tax management behaviour in private family SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 29(1), 218–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2022-0021
  8. Cobham; Alex. (2020). The State of Tax Justice 2020 tax Justice in the time of COVID-19. -.
  9. Delgado, F. J., Fernández-Rodríguez, E., & Martínez-Arias, A. (2018). Corporation effective tax rates and company size: evidence from Germany. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 31(1), 2081–2099. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1543056
  10. Erawati, T., & Novitasari, A. (2021). Pengaruh Transaksi Hubungan Istimewa, Ukuran Perusahaan, Tingkat Hutang Perusahaan Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Tarif Pajak Efektif. 4(2). http://ejurnal.unim.ac.id/index.php/prive
  11. Fang, H., Su, Y., & Lu, W. (2022). Tax incentive and corporate financial performance: Evidence from income tax revenue sharing reform in China. Journal of Asian Economics, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2022.101505
  12. Fernández-Rodríguez, E., García-Fernández, R., & Martínez-Arias, A. (2023). Institutional determinants of the effective tax rate in G7 and BRIC countries. Economic Systems, 101079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101079
  13. Ferry Irawan, A. D. P. (2021). Faktor Penentu Tarif Pajak Efektif Pada Perusahaan Kesehatan: Sebelum dan Saat Covid-19. Jurnal Ekonomi, 26(3), 412. https://doi.org/10.24912/je.v26i3.799
  14. Guedrib, M., & Marouani, G. (2023). The interactive impact of tax avoidance and tax risk on the firm value: new evidence in the Tunisian context. Asian Review of Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-03-2022-0052
  15. Indradi, D., Setyahadi, M., Prodi, ), Akuntansi, F., Ekonomi, U., Pamulang, T., & Selatan, I. (2019). Pengaruh Transaksi Hubungan Istimewa Terhadap Tarif Pajak Efektif Dengan Leverage Sebagai Variabel Moderating. In Jurnal Akuntansi Berkelanjutan Indonesia (Vol. 2, Issue 3).
  16. Jensen, M. C., Meckling, W. H., Benston, G., Canes, M., Henderson, D., Leffler, K., Long, J., Smith, C., Thompson, R., Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. In Journal of Financial Economics (Issue 4). Harvard University Press. http://hupress.harvard.edu/catalog/JENTHF.html
  17. Panda, A. K., & Nanda, S. (2021). Receptiveness of effective tax rate to firm characteristics: an empirical analysis on Indian listed firms. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 15(1), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-11-2018-0304
  18. Plesner Rossing, J. C., & Pearson, T. C. (2022). Tax-compliant transfer pricing of intra-group services: The soft drink case. Journal of Accounting Education, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2022.100815
  19. Richardson, G., & Lanis, R. (2007). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates and tax reform: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(6), 689–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.10.003
  20. Santoso, J. B., Sadeli, D., & Surtikanti, D. (2021). Pengaruh Pengecilan Modal,Transaksi Hubungan Istimewa,dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Tax Avoidance.
  21. Sinclair, D., & Li, L. (2017). Taxation in a mixed economy: the case of China. Studies in Economics and Finance, 34(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-08-2015-0183
  22. Stamatopoulos, I., Hadjidema, S., & Eleftheriou, K. (2019). Explaining corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from Greece. Economic Analysis and Policy, 62, 236–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2019.03.004
  23. Suyanto. (2022). Intensitas Modal, Profitabilitas, Agresivitas Pajak: Ukuran Perusahaan Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. ECOBISMA (Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Dan Manajemen), 9 No 1.
  24. Teguh Erawati, B. Y. J. (2019). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Tingkat Utang, Return On Asset (Roa) Dan Kepemlikan Manajerial Terhadap Tarif Pajak Efektif Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Bei) (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Bei Pada Periode Tahun 2016-2018). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Humanika, 9 No 3.
  25. Utomo, A. B., & Fitria, G. N. (2021). Ukuran Perusahaan Memoderasi Pengaruh Capital Intensity dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak. Esensi: Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 10(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.15408/ess.v10i2.18800
  26. Zimmerman, J. L. (1983). Taxes and Firm Size. In Journal of Accountmg and Economics (Vol. 5).