Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 835 Download : 602

Main Article Content

Abstract

The adoption of Financial Technology (FinTech) and digital banking services has revolutionized the financial industry, providing convenience, accessibility, and cost-effective solutions to users. However, along with its benefits, the widespread use of FinTech has also raised concerns regarding privacy, security, consumer protection, ethical considerations, and regulatory compliance. This paper aims to explore the ethical dimensions of FinTech adoption and the potential negative consequences associated with it. Drawing on qualitative research methods, including interviews and document analysis, the study investigates issues such as consumer privacy, data breaches, trust, financial integrity, adoption barriers, and ethical controversies in the diffusion of FinTech. The findings highlight the importance of addressing these ethical concerns to restore digital ethics in the fintech industry and ensure principles such as fairness, transparency, accountability, and access in technology are realized. The paper concludes by emphasizing the need for a balance between technological innovation and ethical practices to create a sustainable and responsible future for FinTech and digital banking.

Keywords

Fintech Business Ethics

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

By exercising the Licensed Rights, You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License.

How to Cite
Prastyanti, R. A., Rezi, R., & Rahayu, I. (2023). Ethical Fintech is a New Way of Banking. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11(1), 255-260. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v11i1.353

References

  1. Bainbridge, T. (2000). A brief history of the OECD. OECD Observer, 111.
  2. Banna, H., & Alam, M. R. (2021). Impact of digital financial inclusion on ASEAN banking stability: implications for the post-Covid-19 era. Studies in Economics and Finance, 38(2), 504–523.
  3. Devgun, M., Roopesh, B. N., & Seshadri, S. (2021). Breaking the silence: Development of a qualitative measure for inquiry of child sexual abuse (CSA) awareness and perceived barriers to CSA disclosure. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 57, 102558.
  4. Eshete, B. (2021). Making machine learning trustworthy. Science, 373(6556), 743–744.
  5. Flick, U. (2017). Mantras and myths: The disenchantment of mixed-methods research and revisiting triangulation as a perspective. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 46–57.
  6. Masayu Rosyidah, S. T., Rafiqa Fijra, S. T., & others. (2021). Metode Penelitian. Deepublish.
  7. Moenjak, T., Kongprajya, A., & Monchaitrakul, C. (2020). Fintech, financial literacy, and consumer saving and borrowing: The case of Thailand.
  8. Murinde, V., Rizopoulos, E., & Zachariadis, M. (2022). The impact of the FinTech revolution on the future of banking: Opportunities and risks. International Review of Financial Analysis, 81, 102103.
  9. Padmini, S. V. (2019). An Overview on Organization for Economic Co-operation \& Development.
  10. Popescu, C. R. G., & Popescu, G. N. (2019). An exploratory study based on a questionnaire concerning green and sustainable finance, corporate social responsibility, and performance: Evidence from the Romanian business environment. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(4), 162.
  11. Raj, B., & Upadhyay, V. (2020). Role of FinTech in Accelerating Financial Inclusion in India. 3rd International Conference on Economics and Finance Organised by the Nepal Rastra Bank at Kathmandu, Nepal during February, 28–29.
  12. Rovatsos, M., Mittelstadt, B., & Koene, A. (2019). Landscape Summary: Bias In Algorithmic Decision-Making: what is bias in algorithmic decision-making, how can we identify it, and how can we mitigate it?
  13. Woodward, R. (2004). The organisation for economic cooperation and development: Global monitor. New Political Economy, 9(1), 113–127.