Main Article Content

Abstract

The stock market is very important in the country's economy, namely as a source of corporate funding and especially in investments that have the aim of increasing the welfare of investors and companies. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of the rate of return on carbon costs, Brent crude oil, palm oil, interest rates, and exchange rates on the rate of return on energy stock prices in Asia-Pacific countries from 1st January 2016 to end of December 2021. In this study, the phenomena were explored utilizing quantitative approaches to collect data and test previously determined hypotheses. The panel data model is used, as well as the VECM (Vector Error Correlation Model) test. The results show that the influence of CO2 return on energy sector returns is negative in the short term but positive in the long term. Return on energy industry and return on Brent oil have both short-term and long-term unfavorable effects. The return of the use of palm oil has an advantageous long-term and short-term impact on the energy industry's return. The exchange rate has only a short-term negative relationship with the return of energy. Lastly, there is no long-term or short-term correlation between interest rates and the return on energy. The implication of this result is that industries must switch to using environmentally friendly devices and governments must declare regulations to emitters producers.

Keywords

Energy Carbon Price Oil Price, Interest Rate Exchange Rate

Article Details

How to Cite
Almas, M. H., Rizal, N. A., & Kusairi, S. (2023). The Impact of Carbon And Energy Prices on The Return of Energy Sector Stock in Selected Asia-Pacific Countires. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11(1), 177-193. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v11i1.339

References

  1. Alam, M. M. (2009). Relationship between Interest Rate and Stock Price: Empirical Evidence from Developed and Developing Countries. International Journal of Business and Management.
  2. Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian. Jakarta: Pineka cipta.
  3. Armstrong, C. S. (2015). Corporate Governance, Incentives, and Tax Avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1-17.
  4. Budiman. (2012). Pengaruh Karakter Eksekutif Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak (Tax Avoidance) Carbon Pricing. (n.d.). Retrieved from United Nations Climate Change: https://unfccc.int
  5. Dale, S. (2022). Statistical Review of World Energy .Thevakumar, R. J. (2022). Exchange rate sensitivity influencing the economy: The case of Sri Lanka. Research Article.
  6. Damayanti, F. d. (2015). Pengaruh Komite Audit, Kualitas Audit, Kepemilikan Institusional, Risiko Perusahaan Dan Return on Assets Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 187 -206.
  7. Darmadi, H. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial. Bandung: Alfabeta
  8. Desi, N. G. (2016). Pengaruh Likuiditas, Leverage, Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan dan Capital Intensity Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak.
  9. Dewi, S., & Vijaya, P. (2018). Investasi dan pasar modal Indonesia. Depok: Rajawali Pers.
  10. Dominioni, G. (2022). Pricing carbon effectively: a pathway for higher climate change ambition. Climate Policy, 897-905.
  11. Dyreng, S. H. (2010). The Effects of Executives on Corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review.
  12. Fahmi, I. (2012). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan. Bandung: Alfabeta. Gujarati
  13. Faure, A. P. (2014). Interest Rates 1: What are Interest Rates? SSRN Electronic Journal.
  14. Ghozali, I. (2017). Model Persamaan Struktural Konsep Dan Aplikasi Dengan Program AMOS 24. Semarang.
  15. Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  16. Gunawan, J. (2020). Pengaruh Leverage, Kepemilikan Institusional, Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Tax Avoidance Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bei Pada Periode 2015 – 2018. Skripsi.
  17. Gundy Cahyadi, H. G. (2022). Indonesia Carbon Trading Book. Jakarta.
  18. Gundy Cahyadi, H. G. (2022). Indonesia Carbon Trading Hanbook. Jakarta.
  19. Gupta, M. A. (2018, August 24). What is crude palm oil. Retrieved from The Economic Times: https://m.economictimes.com/definition/crude-palm- oil/amp
  20. Halim, Z.A., Zolkefli, M.N., Kusairi, S., Nor, S.M., Haiza, N., Zanawi, M.,& Sukemi, M.N. (2020). Invest: Dataset From Malaysia. Faculty Of Business, Economics, and Social Development, University Malaysia Victoria Institute Of Strategic Economic Studies (Vises), Victoria University, City. Journal Pre-Proof, 106700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106700
  21. Hanafi, M. d. (2003). Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.
  22. Handayani. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Trussmedia Grafika. Harahap, S. S. (2010). analisa Kritis atas Laporan Keuangan.
  23. Heghe, J. V. (2022). Palm Oil Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Nature (Organic & Conventional), By Product (RBD Palm Oil), By End- use (Pharmaceuticals), By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2022 - 2030.
  24. Houston, B. &. (2014). Essentials of financial management. Dasar - dasar manajemen keaungan. Jakarta.
  25. Jasmine, U.’. (2017). Pengaruh Leverage, Kepelimikan Institusonal, Ukuran Perusahaan, Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak (Studi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bei Tahun 2012-2014). Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Riau, 1786–1800.
  26. Jati, D. d. (2014). Pengaruh Karakter Eksekutif, Karakteristik Perusahaan, Dan Dimensi Tata Kelola Perusahaan Yang Baik Pada Tax Avoidance Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 249-260.
  27. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics. In Theory of the Firm: (pp. 305-360).
  28. Kahfi, M. (2019). Ditjen Pajak Temukan Penggelapan Pajak Rp1,17 T. Retrieved from Http://Ekonomi.Inilah.Com/Read/Detail/1529202/Ditjen-Pajak- Temukanpenggelapan-Pajak-Rp117-T
  29. Kasmir. (2008). Analisis Laporan Keuangan, Edisi Pertama, Cetakan Pertama. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  30. Kifni, M. (2011). Ditjen Pajak Temukan Penggelapan Pajak Rp1,17 T. Retrieved fromhttps://konsultanpajaksurabaya.wordpress.com/2011/05/20/penggelap an/
  31. Kusairi, S. (2021). The Impact Of Educational Tourism On Economic Growth: a panel data analysis International Journal Of Business and Globalistion, Januari. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2021.115301
  32. Labiba, D. (2018). Sebaran Emisi Co2 Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Penataan Ruang Area Industri Di Kabupaten Kendal.review pf urban studies and development.
  33. Maddodi, S. (2021). Stock Market Forecasting: A Review Of Literature. International Journal of Information System and Computer Science.
  34. Mardiasmo. (2016). Perpajakan Edisi Revisi Tahun 2016.
  35. Mba, O. (2015). Palm Oil: Processing, Characterization and Utilization in the Food Industry – A Review. Article in Food Bioscience.
  36. Mishkin, F., & Serletis, A. (2016). The Economics Of Money, Banking, And Financial Markets. Canada.
  37. Moreno, B., & Alvarez, M. (2017). Fuel prices impacts on stock market of metallurgical industry under the EU emissions trading system. Spain.
  38. Munawir, S. (2007). analisa Laporan Keuangan. Yogyakarta.
  39. Mustika. (2017). The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility, Company Size, Profitability, Leverage, Capital Intensity and Family Ownership on Tax Aggressiveness. JOM Fekon, Vol. 4, No.1.
  40. Newberry, S. G. (1997). Determinants of the Variability in Corporate Effective Tax Rate. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1-34.