Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 114 Download : 117

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the influence of religiosity, legal awareness, and education on tax reduction zakat, with profit quality as a moderator. The data was collected from 70 respondents, and the statistical analysis was conducted using multiple regression analysis and moderated regression analysis. The results show that religiosity, legal awareness, and education have a significant positive effect on tax reduction zakat. Furthermore, the study finds that profit quality moderates the relationship between religiosity and tax reduction zakat. However, the study finds no significant moderation effect for legal awareness and education on the relationship between tax reduction zakat and profit quality. This study provides insights into the factors that influence tax reduction zakat and the role of profit quality in moderating the relationship between religiosity and tax reduction zakat. The findings may be useful for policymakers, tax authorities, and companies in developing strategies to improve tax compliance and zakat payment.

Keywords

Religiusity Legal Awareness Education Tax Reduction Zakat Profit Quality

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

By exercising the Licensed Rights, You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License.

How to Cite
Saddam, M., Djaddang, S., Darmansyah, D., & Rustandi, H. (2023). Analysis of The Influence of Religiusity, Legal Awareness, and Education on Tax Reduction Zakat with Profit Quality as Moderation. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11(1), 126-136. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v11i1.330

References

  1. Abdullah M, Sapiei NS. Do religiosity, gender and educational background influence zakat compliance. The case of Malaysia. Int J Soc Econ. 2018;45(8):1250-1264.
  2. Abdullah N, Derus AM, Al-Malkawi HAN. The effectiveness of zakat in alleviating poverty and inequalities a measurement using a newly developed technique. Humanomics.
  3. 2015;31(3):314-329.
  4. Abu Bakar NB, Rashid HMA. Motivations of Paying Zakat on Income: Evidence from Malaysia. Int J Econ Financ. 2010;2(3):76-84.
  5. Ahmad IU. Islam and the Economic Challenge. Vol 9.; 1992. doi:10.35632/ajis.v9i4.2540
  6. Al-Mamun A, Haque A, Jan MT. Measuring perceptions of Muslim consumers toward income tax rebate over zakat on income in Malaysia. J Islam Mark. 2019.
  7. Andam A. Factors influencing intention to give zakat on employment income: Experience from Marawi City. 2016;(August):1-93.
  8. Andriani S, Fathya F. Zakat Sebagai Pengurang Pajak Penghasilan Pada Badan Amil Zakat. None. 2013;Vol.4(No.1):13-32.
  9. Anita Md Shariff, Wan Noor Hazlina Wan Jusoh, Norudin Mansor KJ. A Robust Zakah System : Towards a Progressive Socio-Economic Development in Malaysia. Middle-East J Sci Res. 2011;7(4):550-554.
  10. Badan Amil Zakat Nasional. Zakat Potential Mapping Indicator (IPPZ).; 2019. Badan Amil Zakat Nasional. Outlook Zakat Nasional 2020.; 2020.
  11. BAZNAS P. Outlook Zakat Indonesia 2018.; 2018.
  12. Benk S, Budak T, Yüzba B, Mohdali R. The Impact of Religiosity on Tax Compliance among Turkish Self-Employed Taxpayers. Religions. 2016;7(4):1-10.
  13. Bokeno RM. Learning in conflict: Revisiting the role of perception. Dev Learn Organ.
  14. 2011;25(2):15-17.
  15. Bonne K, Verbeke W. Religious values informing halal meat production and the control and delivery of halal credence quality. Agric Human Values. 2008;25(1):35-47.
  16. Ermawati N, Afifi Z. Pengaruh Religiusitas Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Dengan Kesadaran Wajib Pajak Sebagai Variabel Intervening. J Akunt Indones. 2018;7(2):49.
  17. Hanifah H, Yudianto I. The Influence of Religiosity, Nationalism, and Tax Corruption Perception on Tax Compliance: Study of The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) Taxpayers in Bandung City. J Account Audit Bus. 2019;2(1):17.
  18. Jannah W. Pengaruh Keputusan Pendanaan, dan Kebijakan Dividen Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Kualitas Laba Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. J Akad Akunt. 2019;2(1):93-105.
  19. Jun BW, Yoon SM. Taxpayer’s religiosity, religion, and the perceptions of tax equity: Case of south Korea. Religions. 2018;9(11):1-15.
  20. Keputusan Presiden No. 8. Badan Amil Zakat Nasional. Vol 6.; 2001.
  21. M. Umer Chapra. The Islamic vision of development in the light of Maqasid al-Shariah. Occas Pap Ser 15. 2008;(January):1-57.
  22. Meilisa F, Ludigdo U. Persepsi Mahasiswa Akuntansi terhadap Etika Akuntan Pendidik di Jurusan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Brawijaya. J Akunt Multiparadigma. 2010:223-238.
  23. Musaif BR, Adityawarman. PENGARUH PERSEPSI WAJIB PAJAK MUSLIM TERHADAP ( Studi Empiris Wajib Pajak Muslim di Kabupaten Kendal ). Diponegoro J Account. 2020;9(4):1-15.
  24. Muslichah. The effect of tax simplification on taxpayers’ compliance behavior: religiosity as moderating variable. 2015;19(2):98-108.
  25. Nurhayati S, Siswantoro D. Factors on Zakat (Tithe) Preference as a Tax Deduction in Aceh, Indonesia. Int J Nusant Islam. 2015;3(1):1-20.
  26. Obaidullah M. Revisiting estimation methods of business zakat and related tax incentives. J Islam Account Bus Res. 2016;7(4):349-364.
  27. Puskas Baznas. Laporan Hasil Survey Indeks Literasi Zakat 2020. Pus Kaji Strateg BAZNAS. 2020:1-10.
  28. Rahmah M, Suyanto S. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Laba pada Perusahaan Konstruksi yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (The Factors That Influence Earnings Quality at Construction Companies Listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange). Pros Manajerial dan Kewirausahaan. 2020;4:53-62.
  29. Riska Ananda, Ningsih ES. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA) Vol. 1, No. 2, (2016). J Ilm Mhs Ekon Akunt. 2016;1(2):277-294.
  30. Rulian NA, Anggraeni L, Lubis D. Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Memengaruhi Muzaki dalam Memilih Organisasi Pengelola Zakat (OPZ): Studi Kasus di Badan Amil Zakat Nasional Kota Bogor. Al-Muzara’ah. 2015;3(1):20-33.
  31. Santosa PB. Relevansi Dan Aplikasi Aliran Ekonomi Kelembagaan. J Ekon Pembang Kaji Masal Ekon dan Pembang. 2008;9(1):46.
  32. Setianingrum A, Rusydiana AS, Fadhilah PR. Zakat as a Tax Credit for Raising Indonesian Tax Revenue. Int J Zakat. 2019;4(1):77-87.
  33. Siswantoro D, Nurhayati S. Preparedness Response of Indonesian Tax Offices Concerning the Zakat as a Taxable-Income Deduction. Int J Zakat. 2016;1(1):50-63.
  34. Suprayitno E, Abdul Kader R, Harun A. Zakat Sebagai Pengurang Pajak Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Di Semenanjung Malaysia. Inferensi. 2013;7(1):1.
  35. Wahyudi S, Saddam M, Djaddang S. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Persepsi Masyarakat Muslim Terhadap Zakat Sebagai Pengurang Pajak. J Ilm Akunt Kesatuan. 2021;9(1):161- 170.
  36. Wahyudin I, Tosida E, Andria F. Document Title/. Quality. 2019;(March):1-6.
  37. Wasininingsih, JMV Mulyadi. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Nilai Perusahaan dengan Kualitas Laba sebagai Moderasi. J Ris Akunt Perpajak. 2019;6(02):23-30.
  38. Wibisono C, Indrayani, Muda I. Influence of local tax and Zakat Infaq Maslahah through to regional income (overview of new trends in sustainable development). Int J Financ Res. 2019;10(4).
  39. Wulan M, Suhartini T, Syamsul Bahri E. Analysis of the Influence of Tax Service, Tax Advertising, and Zakat Policy as a Reduction of Taxable Income to Tax Paying Compliance for Individual Taxpayers in the Tax Service Office Pratama Sawangan, Depok, West Java. Int J Zakat. 2018;3(1):71-88.
  40. Wuthnow R. The religious factor revisited. Sociol Theory. 2004;22(2):205-218.