Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 116 Download : 92

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of price and promotion on consumer buying interest at PT Nano Herbaltama Internasional, either partially or simultaneously. The research method used is a quantitative method with a descriptive approach. The sampling technique used is a saturated sample using a sample of 113 respondents from the entire population. The results of the research have a significant effect on buying interest partially, as evidenced by the regression equation Y = 11.097 + 0.902X1, a correlation coefficient of 0.860 means that the two variables have a very strong relationship. The value of determination is 86%. The hypothesis test obtained a value tcount > ttable or (17.767 > 1.981) and strengthened by a significant value (0.000 <0.05). Promotion has a significant effect on consumer buying interest partially as evidenced by the results of the regression equation Y = 7.972 + 0.669X2, the correlation coefficient of 0.820 means that the two variables have a very strong relationship level. The value of determination is 82%. The hypothesis test obtained a value of tcount > ttable or (15.083> 1.981) and strengthened by the significance value (0.000 <0.05). The results of the research on price and promotion simultaneously have a significant effect on consumer buying interest as evidenced by the results of the regression equation Y = 7.661 + 0262X1 + 0.616X2. The value of the correlation coefficient between the independent variable and the dependent variable was obtained at 0.877, which means that it has a very strong relationship. The value of the coefficient of simultaneous determination is 87.7%. Simultaneous hypothesis testing obtained Fcount > Ftable or (182,776 > 2,690) and strengthened by the significance value (0.000 < 0.05). Thus H0 is rejected and H3 is accepted. This means that it can have a significant effect simultaneously between price and promotion of consumer buying interest.

Keywords

Reward Price Promotion Consumer Buying Interest

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

By exercising the Licensed Rights, You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License.

How to Cite
Syah, A., Kumara, D., Nizar, N. I., & Hasanah, U. (2022). The Effect of Propolis Product Price and Promotion on Consumer Purchase Interest at PT. Nano Herbaltama International in Setu District, South Tangerang City. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 10(2), 403-407. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v10i2.310

References

  1. Alma. (2014). Manajemen Pemasaran dan Pemasaran Jasa. Bandung : Alfabeta.
  2. Bashu, S., & T. Handoko.(2012). Manajemen Pemasaran Modern. Yogyakarta:
  3. BPFE.Bilson, S. (2013). Panduan Riset dan Perilaku Konsumen . Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  4. Djaslim, S. (2012). Manajemen Pemasaran. Bandung : Linda Karya.
  5. Gerung, C. J. (2017). Pengaruh Kualitas Produk, Harga dan Promosi Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Mobil, Nissan x-trail pada PT
  6. Wahana Wirawan Manado. Jurnal EMBA , 2221 - 2229.
  7. Hani, H. T. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia . Yogyakarta :
  8. BPFE. Hasibuan. (2012). Manajemen . Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
  9. Jonathan, S. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif . Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu .
  10. Ladzi, S. (2012). Manajemen dan Reformasi Pelayanan Publik dalam Konteks Birokrasi Indonesia. Surabaya : Aditya Media Publishing.
  11. Laksana, M.F. (2019) Praktis Memahami Manajemen Pemasaran. Sukabumi: CV Al Fath Zumar.
  12. Lupiyoadi, R. (2012). Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa . Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
  13. Mandey, J. B. (2013). Promosi, Distribusi, Harga, Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Rokok Surya Promild. Jurnal EMBA, 95 - 104.
  14. Nugroho, S. (2013). Perilaku Konsumen . Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media .
  15. Philip, K., Gary , & Armstrong. (2012). Principles of Marketing .Jakarta : Erlangga.
  16. Riyono, & Gigih Erlik Budiharja. (2016). Pengaruh Kualitas Produk, Harga, Promosi dan Brand Image terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Produk Aqua Di Kota Pati. Jurnal STIE Semarang, 1 - 8.
  17. S, A. (2016). Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta .
  18. Salam. (2012). Manajemen Pemerintahan Indonesia . Jakarta: PT Djambatan.
  19. Singgih, S. (2012). SPSS Statistik Parametik . Jakarta : PT Elek Media.
  20. Siregar, S. (2012). Statistik Deskriptif Untuk Penelitian . Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  21. SP, H. (2012). Dasar - Dasar Perbankan . Jakarta: Bumi Aksara . Sudjana. (2012). Metode Statistika . Bandung: Tarsito.
  22. Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D . Bandung : CV Alfabeta .
  23. Supranto. (2013). Pengukuran Tingkat Kepuasan Pelanggan . Jakarta : Pustaka Ekonomi .
  24. Supranto. (2013). Statistik Teori dan Aplikasi . Jakarta : Pustaka Ekonomi
  25. Terry, G. (2012). Dasar – Dasar Manajemen. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
  26. Tjiptono. (2015). Strategi Pemasaran. Yogyakarta : Andi Offset
  27. Tristiana, A. (2016). Pengaruh Kualitas Produk dan Harga Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen Sepeda Motor Honda Vario 125. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Manajemen , 1 - 8 .
  28. Utamai, R. P., & Hendra Saputra . (2017). Pengaruh Harga Kualitas Produk Terhadap Minat Beli Sayuran Organik di Pasar Sambas Medan. Jurnal Niagawan , 1 - 8 .
  29. Wawan, S. (2012). Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi Pendidikan Jasmani Teori dan Praktik Pengembangan . Yogyakarta : FIK UNY.
  30. William, S. (2012). Prinsip – Prinsip Pemasaran . Jakarta : Erlangga.