Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 163 Download : 183

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aim to reveal a number of possible factor influence investors  decisions To do investment in Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending services in Indonesia. Study this use method survey with method distribute questionnaire through googleform to any of the users or a number of service banking . There are 82 questionnaires processed in research this using the PLS smart assistance program . Results in study this prove that Accumulation Transaction and Refund History , as well perception risk take effect to decision gift loan . With evaluate significant factor  about party borrower , then potential investors will more easy for differentiate borrower one with others on P2P lending services With a number of factor , got is known that if party borrower could Fulfill all aspect such , then party borrower has give quality signal tall to potential investors. Results of research this expected could add nor expand knowledge knowledge as well as give proof new about a number of factor to be determinant decision gift loans on P2P lending services.

Keywords

Accumulation Transactions Refund History Perceptions Risk Decision Gift Loan

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

By exercising the Licensed Rights, You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License.

How to Cite
Fatmawati, E., & Parulian, P. (2022). Determinants of the Decision to Provide Loans to Potential Investors on a Peer-to-Peer Lending Platform. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 10(2), 347-351. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v10i2.295

References

  1. Brigham, F. E., & Houston, F. J. (2011). Dasar-dasar Manajemen Keuangan (11th ed). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  2. Chen, S., Gu, Y., Liu, Q., & Tse, Y. (2020). How do lenders evaluate borrowers in peer-to-peer lending in China?. International Review of Economics and Finance, 69, 651-662
  3. Chishti, S., & Barberis, J. (2016). THE FINTECH BOOK The Financial Technology Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs, and Visionaries. Padstow: T.J. International Ltd.
  4. Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies, 59(4), 451-474.
  5. Ge, R., Feng, J., Gu, B., & Zhang, P. (2017). Predicting and Deterring Default with Social Media Information in Peer-to-Peer Lending. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(2), 401-424.
  6. Herzenstein, M., Sonenshein, S., & Dholakia, U. M. (2011). Tell me a good story and I may lend you money: The role of narratives in peer-to-peer lending decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(SPL), S138-S149.
  7. Hsueh, L., & Darnall, N. (2017). Alternative and Nonregulatory Approaches to Environmental Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1-7.
  8. Ion, & Alexandra. (2016). Financial Technology (Fintech) and Its Implementation on the Romanian Non-Banking Capital Market. Bucharest University of Economics Studies, 4(2), 379-384.
  9. Kesharwani, A., & Bisht, S. S. (2012). The impact of trust and perceived risk on internet banking adoption in India: An extension of technology acceptance model. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 30(4), 303-322.
  10. Khan, M. T. I., & Xuan, Y. Y. (2021). Drivers of Lending Decision in Peer-to-peer Lending in Malaysia. Review of Behavioral Finance, 1-15.
  11. Kusuma, H., & Asmoro, W. K. (2020). Perkembangan Financial Technology (Fintech) Berdasarkan Perspektif Ekonomi Islam. Journal of Islamic Economic Development, 4(2), 112-131.
  12. Lin, M., Prabhala, N. R., & Viswanathan, S. (2013). Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Informatio Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending. Management Science, 59(1), 17-35.
  13. Meng, F. (2016). What are the Determinants of lending decisions for Chinese Peerto-peer Lenders?. (Tesis Master, University of Twente, 2016) Diakses dari http://essay.utwente.nl/71436/1/Meng_MA_BMS.pdf
  14. Putritama, A. (2021). Manfaat dan Risiko yang Mempengaruhi Kelanjutan Niat Penggunaan Fintech Pembayaran Seluler. Nominal: Barometer Riset Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 10(2), 214-227.
  15. Rizal, M., Maulina, E., & Kostini, N. (2018). Fintech As One Of The Financing Solutions For SMEs. AdBispreneur: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Administrasi Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 3(2), 89-100.
  16. Ryu, H. S. (2018). Understanding Benefit and Risk Framework of Fintech Adoption: Comparison of Early Adopters and Late Adopters. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3864-3873.
  17. Saksonova, S., & Kuzmina-Merlino, I. (2017). Fintech as financial innovation – the possibilities and problems of implementation. European Research Studies Journal, 20(3A), 961-973.
  18. Stern, C., Makinen, M., & Qian, Z. (2017). FinTechs in China – with a special focus on peer to peer lending. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 10(3), 215-228.
  19. Thaker, M. A. B. M. T., Thaker, H. B. M. T., Rahman, M. P. B., Amin, M. F. B., Pitchay, A. B. A., & Olaniyi, N. O. (2019). Factors Affecting Investors’ Intention to Invest in a Peer-to-peer Lending Platform in Malaysia: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model. ADBI Working Paper,(998), 1- 21.
  20. Yang, Q., Pang, C., Liu, L., Yen, D. C., & Tarn, J. M. (2015). Exploring consumer perceived risk and trust for online payments: An empirical study in China’s younger generation. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 9-24.
  21. Yu, C. S. (2012). Factors Affecting Individuals to Adopt Mobile Banking: Empirical Evidence From The UTAUT Model. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13(2), 104-121.
  22. Yum, H., Lee, B., & Chae, M. (2012). From the wisdom of crowds to my own judgment in microfinance through online peer-to-peer lending platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(5), 469-483.
  23. Zulfikar, M. T. I., & Ardhira, A. Y. (2019). Pengawasan OJK dalam Rangka Mitigasi Risiko pada Peer to peer Lending. PERSPEKTIF, 24(2), 84-94.