Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 240 Download : 208

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of workload and autonomy on organizational commitment with job satisfaction as an intervening variable. This research was conducted at Hang Tuah University Surabaya with 64 permanent lecturers as respondents. Data were collected through a Likert scale 1-5 questionnaire given to respondents and several supporting documents from Hang Tuah University Surabaya. In this study, the data was processed using the PLS-SEM method with WARP-PLS as the analysis tool. The results obtained indicate that the workload has no significant effect on job satisfaction; autonomy has a significant effect on job satisfaction; job satisfaction has a significant effect on organizational commitment; workload has a significant effect on organizational commitment; autonomy has a significant effect on organizational commitment

Keywords

Autonomy Workloads Job Satisfaction Organizational Commitment

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

By exercising the Licensed Rights, You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License.

How to Cite
Fitriana, R. (2022). The Effect of Workload and Autonomy on Organizational Commitment with Job Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable in Permanent Lecturers at Hang Tuah University Surabaya. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 10(2), 320-332. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v10i2.293

References

  1. Ahuja, Manju et. al,. 2002. Overworked and Isolated? Predicting the Effect of Work-family Conflict, Autonomy, and Workload on Organizational Commitment and Turnover of Virtual Workers. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  2. Awang, Z., JH Ahmad, and NM Zin. 2010. Modeling job satisfaction and work commitment among lecturers: A case of UITM Kelantan. Journal of Regional Conference on Statistical Sciences, June 2010: 241-255
  3. Chu Chen, Hsing et. al. 2008. Turnover factors revisited: A longitudinal study of Taiwan-based staff nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45 : 277–285
  4. Currivan, Douglas B. 2000. The Causal Order Of Job Satisfaction And Organizational Commitment In Models Of Employee Turnover. Human Resource Management Review, 9: 495-524
  5. Denton, David W. and Lawrence S. Kleiman. 2001. Job Tenure as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Autonomy and Satisfaction. Applied HRM Research, 6 (2) : 105-114
  6. Donovan, Roxanne A. 2012. Perceptions of stress, workload, and job satisfaction among HSS faculty. Humanities and Social Sciences, 1-2
  7. Dude, David J. 2012. Organizational commitment of principals: The effects of job autonomy, empowerment, and distributive justice. University of Iowa Research Online. (http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/2863accessed on 8 January 2015)
  8. Friedman, Isaac A. 1999. Teacher-Perceived Work Autonomy: The Concept and Its Measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 59 (1): 58-76.
  9. Gaertner, Stefan. 2000. Structural Determinants Of Job Satisfaction And Organizational Commitment In Turnover Models. Human Resource Management Review, 9 : 479 – 498
  10. Groenewegen, Peter. P. and Hutten, Jack. BF1991. Workload and Job Satisfaction among General Practitioners: A Review of the Literature. Journal of ScienceMed. 32 (l0) : 1111-1119
  11. Hackman, JR, and Oldham, GR 1976. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279
  12. Hangtuah.ac.id. 2014. Profile of Hang Tuah University Surabaya. (http://www.hangtuah.ac.id/. Accessed October 23, 2014).
  13. Jin, Myung H. and Mi Young Lee,. 2012. The Effects of Autonomy, Experience and Person-Organization Fit on Job Satisfaction: The Case of the Public Sector. The International Journal of Social Science, 6 (1) : 18-44
  14. Lea, Victoria M. et al. 2012. Workload and its impact on community pharmacists' job satisfaction and stress: a review of the literature. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 20: 259–271
  15. Luthans, F., Baack, D. and Taylor, LA 1987. Organizational commitment: analysis of antecedents. Human Relations, 40 (4): 219-35
  16. McKenna, E. 2000. Business psychology and organizational behavior: a student's handbook 3rd ed. New York: Psychology Press
  17. Meyer, JP and NJ Allen,. 1991. A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 1(01): 1-89
  18. Meyer, JP and Herscovitch, L. 2001. Commitment in the Workplace : Toward a General Model. Human Resource Management Review, 11: 299 – 326.
  19. Mottaz, CJ 1988. Determinants of Organizational Commitment. Human Relations. 41: 467-482
  20. Mowday, RT 1982. Organizational Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover. San Diego CA: Academic Press
  21. Mueller, CW, E. Wallace, and J.L. Price . 1992. Employee commitment: Resolving some issues. Work and Occupations, 19: 211-236.
  22. Naqvi, SMM Raza. et al. 2013. Impact of Job Autonomy on Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction: The Moderating Role of Organizational Culture in the Fast Food Sector of Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Management, 8 (17) : 92-102
  23. Octug, Zeynep. 2013. The Moderating Effects of Age and Tenure on the Relationship between Organizational Identification and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Management, 3(4): 218-222
  24. Peace, Habomugisha. 1993. Organizational Commitment of Female Lecturers in Higher Institutions of Learning in Uganda: Its Nature and Determinant Factors, 1975-1993. Unesco Journal of Libraries
  25. Pearson, Carolyn L and William Moowaw. 2005. The relationship between teacher autonomy, and Stress, Work Satisfaction, Empowerment and Professionalism. Journal of Educational Research Quarterly, 29 (1) : 37-53
  26. Porter, AC 1989. External standards and good teaching: The pros and cons of telling teachers what to do. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11: 343-356
  27. Price, JL 1977. The study of turnover. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
  28. Price, James L. et al. 2004. The Determinants of Jobsatisfaction Among Hospital Nurses: A Model Estimation In Korea. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41 : 437–446
  29. UHT Strategic Plan. 2008. Hang Tuah University Strategic Plan Surabaya (online). (http://www.hangtuah.ac.id/) accessed on 23 October 2014
  30. Robbins, Stephen P. and Timothy A Judge. 2001. Organizational Behavior. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  31. Sabharwal, Meghna and Elizabeth A. Corley. 2009. Faculty job satisfaction across gender and discipline. The Social Science Journal 46 : 539–556
  32. Sahin, H., and Saingoz. 2013. The Relationship between Personnel Workload and Work Satisfaction within Accommodation and Nutrition Establishments. American International Journal of Social Science, 2 (3) : 10-18
  33. Samra, J. et al. 2012. Workload Management. Journal of Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction
  34. Sholihin, Mahfud and Dwi Ratmono. 2013. SEM-PLS Analysis with WarpPLS 3.0 for Nonlinear Relations in Social and Business Research. Yogyakarta: Publisher Andi.
  35. Seo, Youngjoon., et al,. 2004. The determinants of job satisfaction among hospital nurses: a model estimation in Korea. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41 (2004) 437–446
  36. Spector, Paul E., Daniel J. Dwyer, and Steve M. Jex. 1988. "Relation of Job Stressors to Affective, Health, and Performance Outcomes: A Comparison of Multiple Data Sources." Journal of Applied Psychology, 73:11–19
  37. Spector, PE, 1997. Job Satisfaction: Applications, Assessment, Causes, and Consequences. USA : SAGE Publications, Inc.
  38. Tella, Adeyinka. 2007. Work Motivation, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment of Library Personnel in Academic and Research Libraries in Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Library Philosophy and Practice 2007.