Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 428 Download : 235

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the Fraud Pentagon Model on predicting the occurrence of Fraudulent Financial Statements in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016-2018. Pentagon Fraud Model is a development of Fraud Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond, including opportunity, pressure, competence, rationalization, and arrogance. The sample consisted of 83 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2016-to 2018, selected using the purposive sampling method. The data analysis method used is multiple regression with SPSS version 25.0. The results of this study indicate that pressure and arrogance influence the prediction of Fraudulent Financial Statements. While rationalization, opportunity, and competence have no effect in predicting the occurrence of Fraudulent Financial Statements.

Keywords

Fraud Triangle Theory Fraud Quadrant Fraud Triangle Model Fraudulent Financial Reporting

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

By exercising the Licensed Rights, You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License.

How to Cite
Rezeki, F. G. (2022). Analysis of the Effect of Fraud Pentagon Model in Predicting the Occurrence of Fraudulent Financial Statements. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 10(1), 21-24. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v10i1.247

References

  1. Arens A. A., Randal J. E. & Mark S. B. (2015). Auditing dan Jasa Assurance Pendekatan Terintegrasi (15th ed). Jakarta: Erlangga.
  2. Bona P. Purba. (2015). Fraud dan Korupsi: Pencegahan, Pendeteksian, dan Pemberantasannya. Jakarta: Lestari Kiranatama.
  3. Bursa Efek Indonesia. (2018). Laporan Keuangan Tahunan. Diakses pada hari rabu, 07 November 2018 dari World Wide Web: www.idx.co.id
  4. Chatterjee, Arijit, dan Hambrick. (2006). “It's All about Me: Narcissistic Chief Executive Officers and Their Effects on Company Strategy and Performance.” Adminstrative, Vol 52, 351-386.
  5. Cressey, D. (1953). Other People’s Money; a Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Glencoe, IL, Free Press.
  6. Dechow, P. M., R, G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. (1995). Detecting Earnings Management. The Accounting Review 70, 1995: 193–225.
  7. Dellaportas, S. (2013). Conversation with Inmate Accountants: Motivation, Opportunity, and The Fraud Triangle. Accounting Forum, 37(1).
  8. Horwath, C. (2010). “Playing Offensein a High-risk Environtment”. The Unique Alternative to the Big Four.
  9. Montgomery, Douglas, C. (2013). Statistical Quality Control: A Modern Introduction (7th ed). Asia: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  10. Olsen, K. J., & J. Stekelberg. (2016). CEO narcissism and corporate tax sheltering. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, Vol. 38 (1), 1-22.
  11. Schipper, Katherine. (1989). Comentary Katherine on Earnings Management. Accounting Horizon.
  12. Sihombing, Kennedy dan Shiddiq. (2004). Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud: Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Tahun 2010- 2012. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting Vol. 03 No. 02. ISSN (Online): 2337- 3806.
  13. Skousen, K. F., Stice, E. K., Stice, J. D. (2009). Akuntansi Keuangan Menengah, Buku 2 (16th ed), Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat