Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 227 Download : 217

Main Article Content

Abstract

A budget is a plan that is expressed quantitatively in units of money to achieve predetermined organizational goals. This study aims to determine whether there is an effect of opportunistic behavior on budgeting participation and managerial performance. Therefore, this study was conducted to see its consistency with previous studies. Researchers are interested in conducting research in the PT. Telkom Indonesia because of the phenomenon that occurs in the lack of effective managerial performance which results in opportunistic behavior related to the preparation of budget participation in the Employee Pension Fund of PT. Telkom Indonesia. This research was conducted in the PT. Telkom Indonesia Employee Pension Fund environment with the number of samples used as many as 78 employee respondents who were involved in the budgeting process. Analysis of the data used a moderating regression test (MRA) Moderated Regression Analysis with SPSS Software Version 20. The results of this study indicate that the preparation of budgetary participation has a significant effect on managerial performance, while opportunistic behavior is a moderating variable that strengthens the influence of budgetary participation on managerial performance.

Keywords

Budget Participation Managerial Performance Opportunistic Behavior

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

By exercising the Licensed Rights, You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License.

How to Cite
Paryati, R. (2022). Moderation of Opportunistic Behavior between Budget Participation Preparation and Managerial Performance in the Telkom Pension Fund. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 10(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v10i1.242

References

  1. Abdullah, S. & Asmara, J.A. 2006. Perilaku Oportunistik Legislatif Dalam Penganggaran Daerah: Bukti Empiris atas Aplikasi Agency Theory di Sektor Publik. Jurnal Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 9. Padang 23-26 Agustus.
  2. Anthony, R.N., and V. Govindarajan. 2004. Management Control Systems. Homewood, Illinois: McGraw-Hill.
  3. Atkinson, A.A., at al. 1995. Management Accounting, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
  4. Ayudiati, 2010. Analisis Pengaruh Locus of Control Terhadap Kinerja Dengan Etika Kerja Islam Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Tesis, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
  5. Brownell, P. and McInnes, M. 1986. “Budgetary Participation, motivation, and Manajerial performance”. The Accounting Review, Vol. 61, No. 4.
  6. Chow C. W., "The effect of Job Standard Tightness a nd Compensation Scheme on Performance: An Exploration in Linkages", The Accounting Review 58, 1983, pp.106-136.
  7. Ghozali, Imam. 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 20. Semarang: UNDIP.
  8. Hanson, D. R dan M.M. Mowen. 2005. Akuntansi Manajemen. 7 ed. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  9. Halim, A. dan Abdullah, S. 2006. Hubungan dan Masalah Keagenan di Pemerintahan Daerah: Sebuah Peluang Penelitian Anggaran dan Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah 2(1): 53-64
  10. Latifah, Nurul .P. 2010. Adakah Perilaku Oportunistik dalam Aplikasi Agency Theorydi Sektor Publik ?. Fokus Ekonomi Vol. 5 No. 2 Desember 2010 : 85– 94.
  11. Lina. 2015. Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran, Psychological Capital, dan Kinerja Manajerial, Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, Vol. 14, No.3.
  12. Lina & Stella. 2013. Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran terhadap Kinerja Manajerial: Kepuasan Kerja dan Job Relevant Information sebagai Variabel Intervening, Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, Vol. 15, No.1: 37 – 56
  13. Mardiasmo, 2002, Perpajakan, Edisi Revisi, Penerbit Andi , Yogyakarta Mardiasmo, 2004, Otonomi dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah, Penerbit Andi Yogyakarta.
  14. Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge, F. Javier Arze, & Jameson Boex. 2004. Corruption, Fiscal Policy, and Fiscal Management.Working Paper, Georgia State University.
  15. Mahoney, T.A., T.H. Jerdee and S.J. Carroll. 1963. Development of Managerial Performance: A Research Approach. Cincinnati. OH: Soutwestern Publishing Co.
  16. Mowen, M.M., Hansen, D.R., & Heitger, D.L. 2016. Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Business Decision, South Western Cengage Learning.
  17. Maryono, R. 2013. Pengaruh Perubahan Dana Alokasi Umum Terhadap Perilaku Oportunistik Legislatif Dalam Penganggaran Daerah. E-Jurnal UNP.
  18. Narsa, I Made dan Rani Dwi Yuniawati. 2003. Pengaruh Interaksi Antara Total Quality Management Dengan Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja dan Sistem Penghargaan Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Studi empiris pada PT.Telkom Divre V Surabaya. Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Vol. 5, N0. 1, Mei 2003: 18-34.
  19. Robbins, Stephen.P. dan A.J. Timothy. (2008). Perilaku Organisasi. (Edisi 12). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  20. Sekaran, Uma dan Roger Bougie, (2017), Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis: Pendekatan Pengembangan-Keahlian, Edisi 6, Buku 1, Cetakan Kedua, Salemba Empat, Jakarta Selatan 12610
  21. Suad Husnan, 2005. Dasar-dasar Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Sekuritis, Edisi kelima, Yogyakarta: BPFE.
  22. Soleha, N, Galih, & Tansil, L. 2013. The Effect of Budgetary Participation on Job Performance with Psychological Capital and Organizational Commitment as an Intervening Variable (Empirical Study on Dinas Pendapatan dan Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah Districts of Lebak), Prosiding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVI – Manado.
  23. Suartana, I. W. 2010. Akuntansi Keperilakuan: Teori dan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI
  24. Suwanto, S., Sunarsi, D., Erlangga, H., Nurjaya, N., & Haryadi, R. N. (2022). Pengaruh Pemberian Reward dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Prestasi Kerja yang Berdampak pada Kinerja Karyawan pada PT Surya Pratama Gemilang di Bekasi. JENIUS (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia), 5(2), 471-484.
  25. Syahputra, Z. 2014. Budget Participation on Managerial Performance: Related Factors in that influenced to Government's Employee (Study of Indonesian Local Government), Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, Vol.5, No.21
  26. Venkatesh, R & Blaskovich, J. 2012. The Mediating Effect of Psychological Capital on the Budget Participation Managerial Performance Relationship, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 24, No. 1: 159-175.