Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of leadership on performance, the influence of leadership on performance, and the influence of leadership and motivation together on employee performance at the Tamansari District Office, West Jakarta. The research method used in this research is descriptive with a quantitative approach, namely by describing the condition of the respondents and research variables. The population in this study were all employees at the Tamansari District Office, West Jakarta. The sample used was 128 respondents with a simple random sampling technique using the Slovin formula. The data analysis technique uses the Validity Test, Reliability Test, Classical Assumption Test, and Multiple Regression through the Coefficient of Determination (R2), t-test, and F-test. The hypothesis test of the results of this study is that leadership has a positive and significant effect on employee performance by 45%. Partially tested the hypothesis obtained t count > t table or (10.133 > 1.657), so that HO is rejected and H1 is accepted, meaning that there is a positive and significant influence between leadership and on the performance of employees at the Tamansari District Office, West Jakarta. Motivation has a positive and significant effect on employee performance by 45.7%. Partially test the hypothesis obtained t arithmetic > t table or (10.261 > 1.657) so that Ho is rejected and H2 is accepted, meaning that there is a positive and significant influence between motivation on employee performance at the Tamansari District Office, West Jakarta. Simultaneous hypothesis testing of leadership and motivation has a positive and significant effect on employee performance with a coefficient of determination of 53.6%, while other factors influence the remaining 46.4%. The calculated F value obtains hypothesis testing> F table or (105.298 > 2.680); thus, Ho is rejected, and H3 is accepted. It means that there is a simultaneous positive and significant influence between leadership and motivation on employee performance at the Tamansari District Office, West Jakarta City

Keywords

Leadership Motivation Employee Performance

Article Details

How to Cite
Kurniawaty, E., & Subarto, S. (2021). The Effect of Leadership and Motivation on Employee Performance at the Tamansari District Office, West Jakarta Administration. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 9(2), 431-442. Retrieved from https://jurnal.dim-unpas.web.id/index.php/JIMK/article/view/186

References

  1. Andayani, N. R., & Makian, P. (2016). Pengaruh Pelatihan Kerja dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap kinerja Karyawan Bagian PT. PCI Elektronik International (Studi pada Karyawan PT. PCI Elektronik Internasional). Jurnal Akuntansi, Ekonomi dan Manajemen Bisnis.
  2. Anwar Prabu, M. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan, Bandung: PT. In Remaja Rosdakarya.
  3. Arikunto, S. (2012). Prosedur Penelitian (Edisi 2). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  4. Azwar, M. S. (2016). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Komunikasi, Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Manajemen.
  5. Basna, F. (2016). Analisis Gaya Kepemimpinan, Kepuasan Kerja, Komitmen Organisasi Dan Kompetensi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. Jurnal Riset Bisnis dan Manajemen.
  6. Edy Sutrisno. (2013). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Edisi Satu Cetakan ke Empat. In Prenada Media Group Jakarta.
  7. Edy Sutrisno, (2015) Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta: Kencana Fahmi, I. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Teori dan Praktik). In.
  8. Ending Sugiarti. (2018). Pengaruh Stress Kerja terhadap Kinerja karyawan PT. PLN(persero) Area Bintaro. Jurnal : Semarak.
  9. In Islamic Higher Education (A Case Study on Implementation of Knowledge Management Tools in UIN SGD Bandung). Jurnal Pendidikan Islam.
  10. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Teori dan Praktik).
  11. Ghozali, I. (2017). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete IBM SPSS. In Semarang, Universitas Diponegoro.
  12. Hasibuan, S.P, M. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. In Bumi Aksara Jakarta.
  13. Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2016 Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: Penerbit PT. Bumi Aksara.
  14. Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2017). Organisasi & Motivasi. Dasar Peningkatan Produktivitas. In Pagar Alam.
  15. Kartono, K. (2016). Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan, Apakah Kepemimpinan Abnormal Itu? In Rajawali Pers.
  16. Heri Triwanto (2016). Pengaruh Pendidikan, motivasi kerja dan kemampuan kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai Pada Dinas pendapatan pengelolahan Keuangan dan asser daerah Kabupaten Grobogan . Jurnal Akuntansi, Ekonomi dan Manajemen Bisnis.
  17. Mangkunegara, A. P. (2012). Evaluasi Kinerja SDM (Cetakan Keenam). In PT. Refika Aditama.
  18. Nopitasari, E., & Krisnandy, H. (2018). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Demokratis, Motivasi Intrinsik dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT Pangansari Utama Food Industry. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen.
  19. Rivai, V., Bachtiar, & Amar, R. B. (2014). Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan dalam Organisasi. Frum ilmiah.
  20. Santoso, S. (2018). Menguasai SPSS versi 25. In PT Elex Media Komputindo. Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan pendekatan Kuantitatif,
  21. Kualitatif dan R&D. In Metode Penelitian Ilmiah.
  22. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (Research and Development/R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  23. Sugiyono. (2017). MetodePenelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: PT Alfabet. In Sugiyono. (2017). MetodePenelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: PT Alfabet.
  24. Suherman, H. (2018). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. Selaras Karya Raya Jakarta. JENIUS (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia).
  25. Sulastri, L., & Mohammed, H. A. H. A. (2016). Knowledge Management.
  26. Suwanto, & Priansa, D. J. (2016). Manajemen SDM dalam Organisasi Publik dan Bisnis.pdf. In Alfabeta.
  27. Zainal, V. R. (2015). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. manajemen sumber daya manusia untuk perusahaan dari teori ke praktik.