Main Article Content

Abstract

This study was conducted to find factors that influence the Merit System Index Value in State Civil Apparatus Management at the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK), and to find strategies to increase the Merit System Index Value in State Civil Apparatus Management at the Witness and Victim Protection Agency. The research methodology used is descriptive qualitative. Data were obtained from in-depth interviews with key informants, books, journals, laws and regulations, and other related documents. The results of the study are that the factors that influence the Merit System Index Value in State Civil Apparatus Management at the Witness and Victim Protection Agency include laws and regulations, leadership, diversity, digital transformation, organizational culture, and politics. Therefore, the strategies that need to be carried out by the Witness and Victim Protection Agency to be able to increase the Merit System Index Value in State Civil Apparatus Management include 1) short-term strategies include aspects of socialization and training, determination of policies and regulations, appointment of a Merit System Index improvement work team, development of the Personnel Information System; 2) medium-term strategies include aspects of Merit System evaluation, Talent Management, transparency and accountability, and awards; and 3) long-term strategies include aspects of bureaucratic cultural transformation, career development programs, collaboration, and sustainable innovation.

Keywords

Merit System Index Strategy Management of State Civil Apparatus LPSK

Article Details

How to Cite
Riyadi, R. A. M., Silitonga, M. S., & Asropi, A. (2024). Strategy to Increase Merit System Index Value in The Management of State Civil Apparatus in Witness and Victim Protection Agency. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 12(2), 767-781. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v12i2.628

References

  1. Byars, L. L., & Rue, L. W. (2011). Human Resource Management (10th ed). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  2. Demirbilek, N. (2023). Academics looks at The Concept of “Merit.” Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 17. doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00238-w.
  3. Dessler, G. (2017). Human Resource Management. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
  4. Kadarisman. (2018). State Civil Service Management. Depok: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
  5. Quah, J. S. T. (2015). Lee Kuan Yew's enduring legacy of good governance in Singapore, 1959-2015. Asian Education and Development Studies, 4(4), 374–393. doi: 10.1108/AEDS-05-2015-0020.
  6. Malik, K. J., & Prasojo, E. (2023). Determinant Factors in the Implementation of Merit System: An Overview of Indonesian Case. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities, 2(3 ), 1942–1952.
  7. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Organizational Behavior. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  8. Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alphabet.
  9. Sunaryo, B. ( 2014). The Importance of the Affirmative Action Policy Concept in Merit-Based Human Resources (HR) Development for Civil Servants. Journal of Civil Servants Policy and Management, 8(1), 1–11. Sandinirwan, I., Kharomah, R. U., Zubaedah, A., Sueb, M., Syahraini, M., & Fauzi, A. (2022). Factors Influencing the Success of Merit System Implementation in Government Organizations in Indonesia. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 3(2).