Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 117 Download : 80

Main Article Content

Abstract

Public policy management is a vital area in government decision making that affects society at large. In an effort to understand the latest developments in this domain, bibliometric studies are a relevant and effective approach. This article aims to explore current research trends in public policy management through bibliometric analysis of documents indexed in the Scopus database. Through careful searching and application of strict inclusion criteria, we identified 111 documents relevant to this topic. Our analysis includes mapping collaboration networks between researchers, identifying the most frequently cited publications, as well as analyzing the keywords that most commonly appear in the literature. The results provide in-depth insight into recent research trends, dominant research focuses, and contributions of leading researchers in the field of public policy management. It is hoped that this article will be a valuable reference source for researchers, practitioners and decision makers who are interested in understanding and developing effective and sustainable public policies.

Keywords

Bibliometric Public Policy Management Scopus

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

By exercising the Licensed Rights, You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License.

How to Cite
Undang, G. (2024). An Exploration of Recent Developments in Public Policy Management: A Bibliometric Study. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 12(1), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v12i1.528

References

  1. Ayuningtyas, D., Haq, H. U., Utami, R. R. M., & Susilia, S. (2021). Requestioning the Indonesia government’s public policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic: black box analysis for the period of January–July 2020. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 612994.
  2. Berry-James, R. M., Blessett, B., Emas, R., McCandless, S., Nickels, A. E., Norman-Major, K., & Vinzant, P. (2023). Stepping up to the plate: making social equity a priority in public administration’s troubled times. In Social Equity in the Public Administration Classroom (pp. 10–20). Routledge.
  3. Blum, B., & Neumärker, B. K. J. (2021). Lessons from globalization and the COVID-19 pandemic for economic, environmental and social policy. World, 2(2), 308–333.
  4. Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2023). The changing context of public policy. In Public management and governance (pp. 14–26). Routledge.
  5. Chawla, R. N., & Goyal, P. (2022). Emerging trends in digital transformation: a bibliometric analysis. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(4), 1069–1112. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2021-0009
  6. Cosens, B., Ruhl, J. B., Soininen, N., Gunderson, L., Belinskij, A., Blenckner, T., Camacho, A. E., Chaffin, B. C., Craig, R. K., & Doremus, H. (2021). Governing complexity: Integrating science, governance, and law to manage accelerating change in the globalized commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(36), e2102798118.
  7. Head, B. W. (2022). Wicked problems in public policy: Understanding and responding to complex challenges. Springer Nature.
  8. Herweg, N., Zahariadis, N., & Zohlnhöfer, R. (2023). The multiple streams framework: Foundations, refinements, and empirical applications. In Theories of the policy process (pp. 29–64). Routledge.
  9. Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2020). Public policy: A new introduction. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  10. Liu, C., Li, W., Xu, J., Zhou, H., Li, C., & Wang, W. (2022). Global trends and characteristics of ecological security research in the early 21st century: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Ecological Indicators, 137, 108734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108734
  11. Madan, R., & Ashok, M. (2023). AI adoption and diffusion in public administration: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101774.
  12. McDonald III, B. D., Hall, J. L., O’Flynn, J., & van Thiel, S. (2022). The future of public administration research: An editor’s perspective. Public Administration, 100(1), 59–71.
  13. Meuleman, L. (2021). Public administration and governance for the SDGs: Navigating between change and stability. Sustainability, 13(11), 5914.
  14. Muhammad, I., Triansyah, F. A., Fahri, A., & Gunawan, A. (2023). Analisis Bibliometrik: Penelitian Game-Based Learning pada Sekolah Menengah 2005-2023. Jurnal Simki Pedagogia, 6(2), 465–479.
  15. Petridou, E., & Mintrom, M. (2021). A research agenda for the study of policy entrepreneurs. Policy Studies Journal, 49(4), 943–967.
  16. Ranerup, A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2022). Digital discretion: Unpacking human and technological agency in automated decision making in Sweden’s social services. Social Science Computer Review, 40(2), 445–461.
  17. Rizvi, F., Lingard, B., & Rinne, R. (2022). Reimagining globalization and education: an Introduction. In Reimagining Globalization and Education (pp. 1–10). Routledge.
  18. Ruiz, A., & Guevara, J. (2020). Sustainable decision-making in road development: Analysis of road preservation policies. Sustainability, 12(3), 872.
  19. Shawoo, Z., Maltais, A., Dzebo, A., & Pickering, J. (2023). Political drivers of policy coherence for sustainable development: An analytical framework. Environmental Policy and Governance, 33(4), 339–350.
  20. Tichenor, M., Merry, S. E., Grek, S., & Bandola-Gill, J. (2022). Global public policy in a quantified world: Sustainable Development Goals as epistemic infrastructures. Policy and Society, 41(4), 431–444.
  21. Triansyah, F. A., Gunawan, A., & Ramadhaniyati, R. (2023). Factors of Indonesia Economic Growth ( 2017-2022 ). Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Bisnis (JPEB), 11(1), 51–65.
  22. Triansyah, F. A., Mulyadi, H., Supardi, E., & Lizein, B. (2023). Understanding the Evolution of Entrepreneurial Learning: A Bibliometric Overview. Kontigensi : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v11i2.417
  23. Triansyah, F. A., Ugli, Y. K. B., Muhammad, I., & Nurhoiriyah, N. (2023). Determinants of Teacher Competence in Islamic Education: Bibliometric Analysis and Approach. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education Studies (IJIES), 6(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.33367/ijies.v6i1.3458
  24. Valle-Cruz, D., Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E. A. (2020). Assessing the public policy-cycle framework in the age of artificial intelligence: From agenda-setting to policy evaluation. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101509.
  25. Valle-Cruz, D., Fernandez-Cortez, V., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2022). From E-budgeting to smart budgeting: Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in government decision-making for resource allocation. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101644.
  26. Vargas, C., Whelan, J., Brimblecombe, J., & Allender, S. (2022). Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health: a perspective on definition and distinctions. Public Health Research & Practice, 32(2).
  27. Xie, H., Wen, Y., Choi, Y., & Zhang, X. (2021). Global Trends on Food Security Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Land, 10(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020119
  28. Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y.-C., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101577.